Tanking Takes Center Stage: The NBA’s Battle for Competitive Integrity

Reggie Miller vs. The “Basketball Gods”

Hall of Famer Reggie Miller, a paragon of competitive fire, vocally opposed tanking during a Saturday session at the Intuit Dome. Addressing an international press corps, Miller condemned the strategy as an affront to the game’s competitive spirit, issuing a stern warning against “angering the Basketball Gods” and flatly declaring that tanking “never works.” Miller’s sentiment echoes a traditionalist view, where every game, regardless of playoff implications, demands maximum effort and a genuine pursuit of victory. He embodies the ethos of a bygone era where throwing games was seen as sacrilege, undermining the very essence of professional sports.

However, Miller’s staunch position faces counterarguments, particularly from those who view tanking as a legitimate, albeit unglamorous, pathway to sustainable success in a league designed with a draft lottery. The argument for tanking often hinges on the idea that sustained mediocrity is a worse fate than a brief period of intentional losing, particularly for small-market teams or those lacking a clear path to contention. Many analysts, including those here at Tank Watch, would assert that history is replete with examples of strategic losing yielding transformative results.

Consider the recent example of the Philadelphia 76ers. Just last season, facing an injury-riddled roster and dwindling playoff hopes, the Sixers made a calculated decision to pivot. They cautiously managed the returns of key players like MVP candidate Joel Embiid and rising star Tyrese Maxey, effectively “shutting down” their postseason aspirations. The result? A staggering 29 losses in their final 33 games. While some might attribute their subsequent lottery success to luck, the Sixers landed the third overall pick, ultimately selecting the promising young guard VJ Edgecombe. The early returns on this burgeoning backcourt pairing, featuring Maxey and Edgecombe, have been overwhelmingly positive, bolstering Philadelphia’s future.

When asked about the difficult period of last season, Tyrese Maxey acknowledged the personal toll. “Last season was definitely rough to go through for me personally,” Maxey admitted. Yet, he quickly highlighted the silver lining: “This year we’ve done a really good job of turning things around. Like you said,” Maxey continued, “the outcome was VJ Edgecombe, who is like a little brother to me now, you know what I mean? He’s great, man. Not just basketball-wise, but for our team personality-wise and culture-wise for our organization and things that we’re trying to turn around.” Maxey’s words encapsulate the complex trade-off: short-term pain for long-term gain, a gamble that, in the Sixers’ case, appears to be paying dividends.

Commissioner Silver’s Stance and the League’s Response

The league office, however, views such “all’s well that ends well” narratives with increasing concern. Commissioner Adam Silver, facing the issue head-on at his annual All-Star press conference, conceded that tanking “has been part of the league for a long time.” However, he expressed alarm over what he termed “behavior that is worse this year than we’ve seen in recent memory.” This heightened concern has prompted the league to explore various deterrents, with Silver confirming that “all options are on the table,” including the drastic measure of potentially confiscating future draft picks.

Silver’s consistent advocacy for competitive parity is well-documented. Yet, the current landscape suggests the league is arguably closer to achieving its desired competitive balance than it might appear. Despite an estimated eight to nine teams currently engaged in overt tanking strategies (and perhaps one more that arguably should be), that still leaves over two-thirds of the NBA actively competing for playoff berths. This robust majority ensures a compelling and competitive product for fans. Meanwhile, the teams at the bottom are simply utilizing the mechanisms at their disposal—namely, the draft—to improve their fortunes. From this perspective, the “hand-wringing” and “pearl-clutching” from the league often feel more like an optics issue than a practical concern for the overall health of the NBA. Tank Watch posits that fan engagement, particularly for struggling franchises, can actually increase when there’s a clear vision for the future, even if it involves a season or two of intentional losing.

The NBA’s recent implementation of a “player participation policy” further underscores its commitment to stamping out perceived abuses. This policy aims to ensure star players participate in nationally televised games and avoid strategic rests, especially for healthy athletes. However, as the Utah Jazz’s recent fine demonstrated, the policy’s enforcement can lead to subjective interpretations and a “you know it when I see it” standard, creating a problematic gray area that lacks clear guidelines for teams.

NBA Tank Rankings – February 17: The Art of Strategic Losing

Here at Tank Watch, our rankings are a dynamic assessment of which teams are most effectively, and often innovatively, pursuing a high draft pick. Success is measured not by wins, but by the strategic accumulation of losses, particularly those achieved through creative roster management or navigating the league’s player participation policies. Teams that inadvertently stumble into a victory, especially against a fellow bottom-dweller, will see their stock fall.

1. Sacramento Kings (12-44)

Change: —

The Sacramento Kings remain this season’s undisputed champions of the tank. Their commitment to losing has been exemplary, culminating in a brutal 28-point defeat to the Utah Jazz in their final game before the All-Star break. This marked their 14th consecutive loss, a ignominious streak not seen by the franchise since their days as the Cincinnati Royals in the 1970s. Key players like Domantas Sabonis and Keegan Murray have been managing various minor ailments, while Malik Monk, a vital offensive spark, has seen reduced minutes or periods on the injury report. The Kings have strategically elevated players from their G-League affiliate or deep bench, such as Nique Clifford, Dylan Cardwell, and Daeqwon Plowden. In that decisive loss to the Jazz, Clifford shot a dismal 1 for 15 from the floor in 38 minutes, while Cardwell and Plowden combined for a meager 5 of 17 shooting across 60 minutes. While these players are undoubtedly “trying,” their collective output perfectly serves the Kings’ larger objective. It’s a masterclass in controlled incompetence, cementing their position at the top of our Tank Rankings.